Diana Jill Miloro vs Van’s Foods International

• You may be eligible for a cash refund from Van’s Frozen International
• To be eligible for this class action lawsuit, you must have purchased specific Van’s frozen breakfast items 
• Van’s advertised products as “all natural” and “naturally delicious” when they included a synthetic ingredient

If you purchased certain Van’s Frozen International products, you may be eligible for a refund thanks to a class action lawsuit. The packaging on these products touted them as “all natural” and “naturally delicious,” but they contained a synthetic ingredient. Van’s disagrees with the lawsuit and stands by the wording on their packaging. The courts did not decide a verdict in this case, but both sides agreed on an out of court settlement.

• With no proof of purchase, the maximum amount that can be claimed is $4.99 per household.
• With proof of purchase, the maximum that can be claimed is $18 per household.
• Your claim form must be submitted online or by mail and received by December 16, 2015.

You do not need to pay any money to be a part of this class action lawsuit with Van’s. The group’s legal representation will be paid out of the settlement funds. If you agree to be a part of this suit, that means that you can no longer sue Van’s as an individual regarding the matter of their packaging. A final hearing will occur on September 17, 2015 in the Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court. Cash payments will be made once the court agrees on a final approval. Van’s intends to mail out settlement payments within 30 days of final approval. If the court does not approve this settlement or if the settlement is overturned, Van’s will not distribute any funds.

You may contact the administrators of this lawsuit at:

• Diana Jill Miloro, et al. v. Van’s Foods International Inc., c/o Heffler Claims Group,P.O. Box 58668, Philadelphia, PA 19102-8668
• 888-980-9431

Citations

• www.milorosettlement.com

Bank of the West TCPA Settlement

• A class action lawsuit alleges that Bank of the West used an automated phone system to illegally place calls.
• If you received an automated call from Bank of the West between November 2, 2008 and July 22, 2014, on your cellular line, you may be eligible for compensation.
• Bank of the West denies any wrongdoing, but has agreed to an out of court settlement to avoid the financial and time burden of taking this case to trial.

In a class action lawsuit filing, it was alleged that Bank of the West placed telephone calls with an automated system to cell phone holding customers who did not consent to these calls. If these allegations are true, it would mean that the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act was violated, and that Bank of the West must pay compensation to the people that were called.

The law firms of Lieff Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein, LLP along with Meyer Wilson Co., LPA have been appointed to represent the plaintiffs in this case. As a part of the class action suit, you do not have to pay anything to these law firms. Their compensation comes out of the total settlement funds if they are approved

• As a part of this settlement, customers may also ask that they receive no further communications from Bank of the West. You must send in a specific request to stop these calls.
• The payment per individual in this case is estimated to be in the range of $25 to $50.
• If you do not file a claim in this case by the deadline, it will be determined that you consented to receiving the calls, and you will waive any further entitlement to sue.

If you have questions, the administrators of this lawsuit can be contacted at:

• Bayat v. Bank of the West c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC, P.O. Box 8060, San Rafael, CA 94912-8060
• info@bayatTCPAsettlement.com
• 877-430-3694

Citations

• www.bayattcpasettlement.com

BMW Z4 296 Wheel Class Action Settlement

• If you owned or leased a 2009 to 2012 BMW Z4, and you have 296 style wheels on it, you may be entitled to a cash settlement
• You must have repaired or replaced the wheel because of a crack due to loss of air pressure
• The crack must have occurred while the vehicle was still under the original 4 years or 50,000 mile warranty

In a recent class action lawsuit, it was alleged that the BMW company manufactured a defective wheel on their 2009 to 20012 year Z4 models equipped with 296 style wheels. These wheels would crack during conditions they should have withheld.

If you file a valid claim, you will be compensated for any out of pocket costs you incurred as a result of this defect. You must provide receipts that show the work you had done and how much the cost was. There is a maximum $800 total reimbursement repayment. If you presently have one of these vehicles, and it’s in the warranty period, BMW will make repairs free of charge as there is no sign of abuse or misuse.

These repairs and reimbursement will only be made if the settlement is approved. The fairness hearing will be held at the end of October 2015. At that date, a judge will determine if the settlement is appropriate. If approved, reimbursement checks will be sent out within 30 days. There is nothing that you need to pay to be a part of this settlement. All legal fees are covered for you, and will be paid out of the amount of the total settlement. Legal council will be paid first, and any remaining funds will be distributed among the class claimants.

You can contact the claims administrator for the BMW Z4 lawsuit at:

• Claims Administrator, c/o Gilardi & Co., LLC, P.O. Box 8060, San Rafael, CA 94912
• 888-564-6026
• Elliot Conn, Nancy Barron, Kemnitzer Barron & Krieg, 445 Bush Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
• 800-273-4566
• Elliot@kbklegal.com

Citations

• www.z4296wheelsettlement.com